The final
chapter in Daniels and Zemelman’s book functions somewhat like an overview of
previously discussed material. Some of
the points which struck me the most are things that I have believed for a very
long time. 1.) Students need to read a
lot; volume, quantity, and practice count.
In this case, D&Z use studies to back up their claim that students
who read more will do better on standardized test reading scores. They do not simply cite claims to support
their beliefs. In fact, they go so far
as to mention opposing claims and refute them with their research. Opposing views mention that some students
read more because they are better readers, instead of students becoming better
readers because they read more. Although
I have not done research on either of these viewpoints, I would think it only
logical that students who do more reading would become better readers. That is not to say that students must read books
by Stephen Hawking or Jane Austen all the time in order to become better readers. Give them a copy of Harry Potter and
let them have some fun. Even if their
reading levels do not improve, the worst that could happen is that they read a
book—I’m not exactly seeing the bad there.
Another
point I would like to highlight from the chapter claims that students need to
read plenty of material at a comfortable reading, recreational reading level,
not frustration level. I think these two
points go hand-in-hand. Students do not
need to read “hard” books in order to glean knowledge. For instance, think about literary
theory. Students do not need to read
Saussure’s essays on linguistics in order to discover that assigned words are
arbitrary in nature; give them a wordless graphic novel and they will discover
that on their own with very little prompting.
My point is this: reading does not have to be incredibly difficult for
students to learn from it. In fact,
studies have shown that students’ reading improves if no more than 10% of the
content is difficult for them to grasp. Reading
material does not have to be hard to be important.
Hi Denise,
ReplyDeleteI agree with you that reading should be fun! If students become frustrated with reading challenging material time after time, they will never enjoy the beauty of reading. Don't get me wrong - I'm not suggesting that students should not read difficult material (because they should sometimes challenge their minds). Instead, I'm offering that students should have choice and read for pleasure often. I like your point that "studies have shown that students’ reading improves if no more than 10% of the content is difficult for them to grasp. Reading material does not have to be hard to be important." As teachers, I think that it is highly important for us to understand this. From my perspective, my goal is to get my students reading.
Also, I have had such a great experience with you as my co-teacher. Thanks for everything, and keep in touch!