|
||
Lesson Plan Template
for SED 406 and 407
part 1 = planning
|
||
Teacher Candidate:
Denise Roberts
|
Subject:
English
|
Grade(s):
10
|
Name of Lesson:
Lord of the Flies Breakdown
|
||
Learning Objective(s), including Bloom's taxonomic level:
(label A, B, C, *D) *optional
Application and
Analysis
Students will work in
groups to analyze provided writing prompts using at least four examples from
the book.
|
||
Student Standards (GSE or/GLE or Common Core-in draft for
math/science- list which):
Common Core Grade 10
Reading Standard 1: 1. Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support
analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from
the text.
|
||
Teacher Standards (professional society and/or NETS and RIPTS-list which):
RIPTS 5.2: Teachers
pose questions that encourage students to view, analyze, and interpret ideas
from multiple perspectives.
|
||
Rationale: Why this lesson? How does it fit into the curriculum and context?
Is this the introduction, conclusion, or somewhere in the
middle of the unit of instruction?
This lesson will be
taught toward the end of the unit to encourage higher-level learning by
interpreting the novel.
|
||
Materials/Resources needed, including technology:
Pens, paper, copies
of novel
|
||
Accommodations and Modifications
n/a
|
||
What content resources support this knowledge base? (list at
least 2)
|
||
How confident are you in this topic as you start this lesson?
Very confident
|
Lesson
Plan Template
part 2 = action
|
||||
Bell-ringer: How will you get students seated, and ready for
academic work? (without your voice)
|
||||
Anticipatory Set: How will you introduce the material,
interest the students, show relevance of topic?
|
||||
Phase
(change as needed)/Time
|
Teacher action
|
Student action
|
Questions/Assessments
|
|
E.g. Intro/5 min.
|
Ask students to work in writer’s notebooks
|
Exploratory writing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Presentation or
Open-ended/
|
Introduce goals for
assignment, have students separate into groups, give out prompts
|
Students will
separate into groups and determine if they will agree or disagree with prompt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guided Practice or
Convergent/
|
Move amongst groups
and help if necessary. Make sure students are on task.
|
Students work to find
4 textual examples to support their thesis.
|
Informal assessment:
are all students participating in their positions in group?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closing/
|
Check progress of
students and tell them to be ready to present their work the next day.
|
Finish up group work
and be ready to present findings the following day.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HW/Application/
|
Fine-tune work to
present
|
If citations have not
all been found, students may complete the work at home.
|
|
|
Review and Reflection: How will you review for students who
are still having trouble?
I will give hints
that the student may choose from while still allowing them to draw their own
conclusions from the text.
|
||||
Extension: What will you offer to students who have mastered
this?
They will be allowed
to decide what order they will present their findings the next day.
|
||||
*Closing: How will you review the material, and draw conclusions? (may be
listed above)
Conversations with
students in groups. I will see where
they are and help them if they struggle.
|
|
Lesson Plan Template
pt. 3 = reflection
|
WHAT?
|
What went well?
All students actively
participated in assignment.
|
|
What area of weakness needs addressing?
Some students argued
during group time—maybe consider separating them next time.
|
|
Which objectives were met? What is the evidence?
The objective was
met. All groups found their required
examples and were able to explain their thinking in informal assessments.
|
|
Which students did not meet objectives?
One group only found
2 examples from the text. They were
given until the next day in class to finish.
|
|
Was time managed appropriately?
Yes
|
|
Did any teacher mannerisms or actions detract from the lesson?
no
|
|
*What were the strengths and weaknesses of classroom
management?
The argument was
ended immediately and did not lead to a worse altercation. 2 girls were off task at different times,
but were quietly reminded to focus and continue their assignment.
|
SO WHAT?
|
Was the lesson engaging?
Yes
|
|
*What did I learn from my peer observation (address at least
one aspect)
I learned that some
students become emotionally involved with the text and I should use this to
my advantage.
|
NOW WHAT?
|
How will this experience influence your professional identity?
Students are able to
thrive when they work together and can run ideas by their peers. I will definitely try to utilize this
whenever possible in my future classroom.
|
|
How will it influence how you plan/teach/assess in the future?
I learned that
students are more comfortable with informal assessments which help them know
whether or not they are on the right track with their work. I will be sure to use this tactic whenever
possible.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment